| Now we've got both sides of the page here. Look at that. Now what are we seeing here, is that a liver? Yes, it's a study of the internal organs of the foetus. Leonardo clearly dissected pre-term children. Yuk. Were they allowed to do that? Yes, he was doing it in monastery hospitals in full knowledge of the church. There was no prohibition. Really? In a Catholic country? How surprising. As long as it was done respectfully, there was direct papal sanction to conduct this sort of work. When Charles II acquired these, would he have felt that they added to his stature as a monarch interested in the arts and in sciences? He clearly had an interest in the arts and the sciences. He was founder of the Royal Society after all. I think they would have been regarded primarily as a curiosity in many ways, rather than understood in the way which we understand them. Oh works? So they wouldn't have been regarded as works of art? Yes, well both works of art and scientific studies. Leonardo had a reputation at the time as a bizarre genius in some ways, and it was very obvious that he was taking the subject far beyond what anybody else at the time was doing. These drawings are unique. They are probably the jewel of the entire collection. | |
| 这一页贴着双面的画，看看~ 我们现在看到的是一个肝脏？ 对，这是一个胎儿的内脏研究。达芬奇显然解剖了一个早产儿，呃~~允许他们那样做吗？ 教会完全允许，他也是在教会医院做的解剖 在一个天主教国家也允许？ 太惊讶了 只要恭恭敬敬的教皇就会同意进行这项工作，查理二世得到这本画集的时候有没有觉得，在艺术和科学方面，会增长他的水平？ 他对艺术和科学确有浓厚的兴趣，还建立了皇家学会。我想这些画，首先是满足了他的好奇心，而不是像今天我们这样的理解。 所以这些画也不被看作是艺术作品？ 不 |
| Now we' ve got both sides of the page here. Look at that. Now what are we seeing here, is that a liver? Yes, it' s a study of the internal organs of the foetus. Leonardo clearly dissected preterm children. Yuk. Were they allowed to do that? Yes, he was doing it in monastery hospitals in full knowledge of the church. There was no prohibition. Really? In a Catholic country? How surprising. As long as it was done respectfully, there was direct papal sanction to conduct this sort of work. When Charles II acquired these, would he have felt that they added to his stature as a monarch interested in the arts and in sciences? He clearly had an interest in the arts and the sciences. He was founder of the Royal Society after all. I think they would have been regarded primarily as a curiosity in many ways, rather than understood in the way which we understand them. Oh works? So they wouldn' t have been regarded as works of art? Yes, well both works of art and scientific studies. Leonardo had a reputation at the time as a bizarre genius in some ways, and it was very obvious that he was taking the subject far beyond what anybody else at the time was doing. These drawings are unique. They are probably the jewel of the entire collection. | |
| zhe yi ye tie zhe shuang mian di hua, kan kan wo men xian zai kan dao de shi yi ge gan zang? dui, zhe shi yi ge tai er de nei zang yan jiu. da fen qi xian ran jie pou le yi ge zao chan er, e yun xu ta men na yang zuo ma? jiao hui wan quan yun xu, ta ye shi zai jiao hui yi yuan zuo de jie pou zai yi ge tian zhu jiao guo jia ye yun xu? tai jing ya le zhi yao gong gong jing jing de jiao huang jiu hui tong yi jin xing zhe xiang gong zuo, zha li er shi de dao zhe ben hua ji de shi hou you mei you jue de, zai yi shu he ke xue fang mian, hui zeng zhang ta de shui ping? ta dui yi shu he ke xue que you nong hou de xing qu, hai jian li le huang jia xue hui. wo xiang zhei xie hua, shou xian shi man zu le ta de hao qi xin, er bu shi xiang jin tian wo men zhe yang de li jie. suo yi zhei xie hua ye bu bei kan zuo shi yi shu zuo pin? bu |
| Now we' ve got both sides of the page here. Look at that. Now what are we seeing here, is that a liver? Yes, it' s a study of the internal organs of the foetus. Leonardo clearly dissected preterm children. Yuk. Were they allowed to do that? Yes, he was doing it in monastery hospitals in full knowledge of the church. There was no prohibition. Really? In a Catholic country? How surprising. As long as it was done respectfully, there was direct papal sanction to conduct this sort of work. When Charles II acquired these, would he have felt that they added to his stature as a monarch interested in the arts and in sciences? He clearly had an interest in the arts and the sciences. He was founder of the Royal Society after all. I think they would have been regarded primarily as a curiosity in many ways, rather than understood in the way which we understand them. Oh works? So they wouldn' t have been regarded as works of art? Yes, well both works of art and scientific studies. Leonardo had a reputation at the time as a bizarre genius in some ways, and it was very obvious that he was taking the subject far beyond what anybody else at the time was doing. These drawings are unique. They are probably the jewel of the entire collection. | |
| zhè yī yè tiē zhe shuāng miàn dí huà, kàn kàn wǒ men xiàn zài kàn dào de shì yí gè gān zàng? duì, zhè shì yí gè tāi ér de nèi zàng yán jiū. dá fēn qí xiǎn rán jiě pōu le yí gè zǎo chǎn ér, è yǔn xǔ tā men nà yàng zuò ma? jiào huì wán quán yǔn xǔ, tā yě shì zài jiào huì yī yuàn zuò de jiě pōu zài yí gè tiān zhǔ jiào guó jiā yě yǔn xǔ? tài jīng yà le zhǐ yào gōng gōng jìng jìng de jiào huáng jiù huì tóng yì jìn xíng zhè xiàng gōng zuò, zhā lǐ èr shì dé dào zhè běn huà jí de shí hòu yǒu méi yǒu jué de, zài yì shù hé kē xué fāng miàn, huì zēng zhǎng tā de shuǐ píng? tā duì yì shù hé kē xué què yǒu nóng hòu de xìng qù, hái jiàn lì le huáng jiā xué huì. wǒ xiǎng zhèi xiē huà, shǒu xiān shì mǎn zú le tā de hào qí xīn, ér bú shì xiàng jīn tiān wǒ men zhè yàng de lǐ jiě. suǒ yǐ zhèi xiē huà yě bù bèi kàn zuò shì yì shù zuò pǐn? bù |
YouTube搜索结果 (转至YouTube)